You're looking at the prep tool
I'd run my book with.
For my application to the Client Partner role, I figured it's better to show than tell. Objection Handler maps the objections advertisers are raising about ChatGPT ads, by vertical: what's true, the counter, the next step.
Travel
airlines, OTAs, hotelsThe Room
A VP of Performance who owns blended CAC, and a Head of Measurement with the veto. Interested, unconvinced, better at math than you.
Objection One
- They say
- "Attribution is unproven and the reporting is thinner than Google's."
- What's true
- It is, today.
- The counter
- Design the test on their incrementality framework, not our reporting.
- Next step
- Their measurement lead in meeting one, not meeting three.
Objection Two
- They say
- "By the time the ad shows up, the model already told the traveler what to book."
- What's true
- Sponsored slots render after the answer. Published design.
- The counter
- In travel the answer is a shortlist, and a shortlist is where a contender wins.
- Next step
- Build around comparison queries, not single-answer ones.
Objection Three
- They say
- "Our budgets are committed to Google and Meta."
- What's true
- Nobody unwinds core spend for an early platform.
- The counter
- The ask is experimental budget with a proof bar, not a reallocation.
- Next step
- Size it so finance can approve without touching the annual plan.
Test Structure
Geo-holdout or cohort test. Incremental bookings and cohort CPA vs blended CAC. Scale gate agreed in writing.
The Close
A 90-day cohort on their framework, exec review at day 45. Small enough for a yes, structured enough to scale.
Retail & Beauty
omnichannel, DTCThe Room
A VP of Media and an eCommerce lead, with brand and legal one door down. Curious, brand-protective.
Objection One
- They say
- "An AI conversation is a brand-safety risk we can't control."
- What's true
- The bar should be high.
- The counter
- Ads are labeled and separate from answers; sensitive-conversation limits are published policy.
- Next step
- Do the policy walkthrough before they ask.
Objection Two
- They say
- "What if the model recommends against us and our ad sits under it?"
- What's true
- The answer is earned, not bought. As it should be.
- The counter
- Show up in comparison moments in categories you already win on merit.
- Next step
- The ad amplifies. It never argues.
Objection Three
- They say
- "Early click-through rates look weak next to search."
- What's true
- Early CTRs trail Google's. On record.
- The counter
- Measure assisted basket size and new-to-brand rate, not last-click.
- Next step
- Agree the metric set before launch, or the retro writes itself.
Test Structure
Assisted-journey cohort vs a paid-social lookalike: new-customer CPA, basket size, loyalty signups.
The Close
One category, 60 days, brand team in the room.
Local & Delivery
marketplaces, on-demandThe Room
A VP of Growth plus finance, at a company that runs its own ads platform. They'll out-math a weak pitch in ten minutes.
Objection One
- They say
- "Your CTR is lower than what we get on Google."
- What's true
- On early benchmarks, yes.
- The counter
- Judge the surface on CPA and incrementality, not CTR.
- Next step
- Offer the geo-holdout on day one.
Objection Two
- They say
- "Branded search already captures this demand."
- What's true
- Some of it, at a rising price.
- The counter
- A new surface is the cleanest read on what's truly incremental.
- Next step
- Frame it as the cannibalization audit finance already wants.
Objection Three
- They say
- "The tooling is rudimentary. Very few levers."
- What's true
- Fewer levers than Google Ads. No pretending.
- The counter
- The window is before the tooling matures and the auction fills.
- Next step
- Their product feedback becomes part of the deal.
Test Structure
Geo-holdout, two matched metros: new-customer CPA, 90-day frequency, measured cannibalization.
The Close
Six weeks, two metros, read together weekly. If the holdout works, scaling is a spreadsheet conversation.
Fintech
regulated categoriesThe Room
Compliance first, CMO second, growth third. That ordering is the point.
Objection One
- They say
- "We can't risk a regulatory headline for an experimental channel."
- What's true
- Completely. No test is worth an enforcement letter.
- The counter
- Policy before commerce: cleared products, approved claims, then spend.
- Next step
- First meeting is compliance-to-policy, not sales-to-marketing.
Objection Two
- They say
- "AI answers about money are a minefield."
- What's true
- Money deserves the highest bar on any surface.
- The counter
- Answer-ad separation beats any keyword blocklist they run today.
- Next step
- Policy docs in their compliance file before the pitch deck.
Objection Three
- They say
- "The measurement is thin, and our audit trail needs more."
- What's true
- Reporting is early. Regulated advertisers need more.
- The counter
- Define the audit trail together; their requirements become the template.
- Next step
- Route them to the ads team as product feedback.
Test Structure
Cleared-scope pilot, one product line. Metrics set after scope, not before.
The Close
Two quarters: policy now, pilot next. How I built Google's regulated book from zero.